From Market Need to Wiring Diagram: Why Translating Product Requirements Is Mission-Critical for UK Electrical Design Teams
- stephendyson7
- Sep 24
- 2 min read
In the built environment, electrical design engineering is often the last line of defence between a brilliant product idea and a costly on-site failure. Yet too often, the bridge between market need and technical specification is weak—or worse, missing entirely.
As someone who’s worked across product strategy, innovation, and launch cycles in the UK’s residential and commercial building sectors, I’ve seen this gap play out repeatedly. A product team identifies a market opportunity, say, a modular lighting system for retrofit applications, but the requirements handed to the electrical design team are vague, incomplete, or misaligned with real-world constraints.
The result? Rework. Delays. Compliance risk. And a product that doesn’t quite deliver what it promised.
Why Market Needs Must Be Translated—Not Just Transferred
Market needs are often expressed in broad strokes:
“Installers want faster fitouts.”
“Specifiers need better energy data.”
“Occupants expect seamless control.”
But electrical design teams need precision:
What’s the expected load profile?
What control protocols must be supported?
What are the spatial constraints for cable routing and containment?
How will the system interact with legacy infrastructure?
Without this level of detail, design teams are left guessing—or forced to make assumptions that may not hold up on site.
The Role of Product Management in Bridging the Gap
This is where strong product management comes in. Translating market insight into actionable, testable, and technically feasible product requirements is not just a nice-to-have, it’s a strategic imperative.
A few best practices I’ve seen work well:
Co-authoring requirements with engineering teams, not just handing them over
Running joint discovery sessions with installers, specifiers, and designers
Mapping requirements to compliance checkpoints (e.g. BS 7671, Part L)
Using Jobs-to-Be-Done frameworks to uncover hidden technical needs
When done right, this process doesn’t slow down innovation, it accelerates it. Because clarity reduces friction. And friction is the enemy of launch.
What Electrical Design Teams Need to Ask
If you’re part of an electrical design team, here are five questions to ask when reviewing product requirements:
Are the technical performance assumptions realistic for the application?
Is the control strategy clearly defined and interoperable?
Are installation constraints (space, access, tools) accounted for?
Are compliance and testing requirements mapped to design stages?
Is there a feedback loop post-install to improve future iterations?
These questions aren’t just technical, they’re strategic. They ensure that the product doesn’t just work in theory but thrives in practice.
Let’s Build Better Together
I’d love to hear from fellow engineers, product managers, and innovators in the UK electrical design space:
What’s the biggest challenge you face when translating product requirements?
What tools or processes have helped you bridge the gap between market and design?
What would you change about how product teams engage with engineering?
Drop your thoughts in the comments. Let’s make this a space for real dialogue, not just another scroll-past post.
And if you’re working on a product that needs sharper alignment between market needs and electrical design, let’s talk. I help teams build clarity, reduce risk, and launch with confidence.
Comments